사무엘상 16:18의 미드라쉬

Our Rabbis were taught a Sota cast her eyes upon things which did not belong to her; the consequence was, that which she desired she did not get, and even that which she did have was taken from her. For, whoever casts his eye to desire things which do not belong to him the result will be that not only will he not obtain his desire, but even that which belongs to him will also be taken from him. (Ib. b) And so also do we find in the case of the first serpent which cast an eye upon a thing that did not belong to it and the consequence was that what he desired he did not get, and even what he did have was also taken from it. At that time the Holy One, praised be He, said to the serpent: "I contemplated making it a king over all the beasts and animals, but now [when he desires things which do not belong to him] (Ib. 3, 14) Be thou cursed above all the cattle, and above other beast of the field. I had ordered you to go straight-forward, but now, since you want [to reign even over man] (Ib., ib., ib.) Upon thy belly shalt thou go; I thought that his food would be human food, but now (Ib) and dust shall thou eat. The serpent said: "I shall kill Adam and then marry Eve." Therefore (Ib) I will put enmity between thee and the woman and between thy seed and her seed. So also do we find in the case of Cain (Ib. 4, 3-15); in the case of Korah, (Nem. 16, 1-35) in the case of Bilam (Ib. 22); in the case of Doeg (I Sam. 16, 18); in the case of Achitofel (II Sam. 17, 1-24), and with Gechazi (II Kings 5, 20-27), with Abshalom (II Sam. Chaps. 15 to 18) with Adoniyah (I Kings 1, 13-26), with Usyachu (II Kings 26, 15-22) and with Hamon, who cast eyes with the purpose of obtaining things which did not belong to them and the consequence was that what they desired was not given to them and even that which they did have in their own hands was taken away from them.

“Naomi had an acquaintance of her husband’s, a mighty man of valor, from the family of Elimelekh, and his name was Boaz” (Ruth 2:1).
“Naomi had an acquaintance [moda] of her husband’s, a mighty man of valor” – moda means relative. Rabbi Abbahu said: If a giant marries a giantess, what do they produce? Mighty men of valor. Boaz married Ruth; what did they produce? David, “who knows how to play, a mighty man of valor, a man of war, understanding in matters, a comely man, and the Lord is with him” (I Samuel 16:18). “Who knows how to play” – [refers to his expertise] in Bible; “a mighty man of valor” – in Mishna; “a man of war” – he knows to negotiate the battle of Torah; “understanding in matters” – in good deeds; “a comely man” – in Talmud. Alternatively: “Understanding in matters” – he infers one matter from another matter; “a comely man” – who displays understanding in halakha; “and the Lord is with him” – the halakha is in accordance with his opinion.
“From the family of Elimelekh, and his name was Boaz” – the wicked precede their name: “Goliath was his name” (I Samuel 17:4); “Naval is his name” (I Samuel 25:25); “Sheva son of Bikhri was his name” (II Samuel 20:21). However, the righteous, their names precede them: “And his name was Kish” (I Samuel 9:1); “and his name was Saul” (I Samuel 9:2); “and his name was Yishai” (I Samuel 17:12); “and his name was Mordekhai” (Esther 2:5); “and his name was Elkana” (I Samuel 1:1). It is because they are similar to their Creator, as it is written: “But with My name, the Lord, I was not known to them” (Exodus 6:3).
They objected to him: “And his name was Laban” (Genesis 24:29). Rabbi Yitzḥak said: This is an obvious characteristic.¹⁴⁹He was extremely white [lavan] or was a senior judge who sought to clarify matters. Laban was not his real name. Rabbi Berekhya said: He was blatant [meluban] in his wickedness. But is it not written: The sons of Samuel, “the name of the firstborn was Yoel and the name of his second, Aviya” (I Samuel 8:2), [and] the Rabbis say: Just as this one was wicked, so too, that one was wicked? Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said: Because they changed their actions and merited the Divine Spirit, as it is stated: “The word of the Lord that was to Joel [Yoel] son of Petuel” (Joel 1:1).¹⁵⁰The midrash interprets Petuel as a reference to Samuel; see Bemidbar Rabba 10:5.

“He said: Bring the kerchief that is upon you, and hold it, and she held it. He measured six measures of barley, and placed it on her; and he came to the city” (Ruth 3:15).
“He said: Bring [havi (fem.)] the kerchief that is upon you,” – hava [masc.] is written,²²⁴In the standard version of the book of Ruth, this term is actually written havi, not hava. teaching that he spoke to her in masculine language so no one would sense.²²⁵That a woman was present. “And hold it,” teaching that she girded her loins like a man.²²⁶She was very powerful in her ability to carry so great a burden. “He measured six measures of barley, and placed it on her.” ²²⁷The literal translation is “six barleys” rather than six measures of barley. Rabbi Simon said: Bar Kappara expounded in Tzippori: Is it the way of a king²²⁸Boaz, who was a judge. to marry a woman with six grains of barley? Or is it the way of a woman to carry six se’a? Rabbi Yehuda bar Rabbi Simon said: By virtue of “he measured [vayamod] six barleys and he placed them on her,” she was privileged, and six righteous men emerged from her, and each one of them had six attributes [middot]: David, Hezekiah, Josiah, Ḥananya, Mishael, Azarya,²²⁹Ḥananya, Mishael, and Azarya are counted here as one, because they acted together and displayed the same characteristics (Matnot Kehuna). Daniel, and the messianic king.
David, as it is stated: “Skillful in playing, a mighty man of valor, a man of war, understands matters, a comely person, and the Lord is with him” (I Samuel 16:18). Hezekiah, as it is stated: “For abundant authority and boundless peace on the throne [of David]” (Isaiah 9:6). “He called his name: Wonder, adviser, leader, mighty, eternal father, prince of peace” (Isaiah 9:5). Some say: “For abundant authority [lemarbe hamisra]…,” lemarbe is written without a mem.”²³⁰Actually, it is written with a closed mem, usually found at the end of the word; an allusion to the fact that Hezekiah was disqualified from being the messianic king because he failed to sing God’s praises (Sanhedrin 94a). Josiah, as it is stated: “For he will be like a tree planted by the water, that spreads its roots near the river, [does not see when heat comes, its foliage will be fresh; and will not be anxious in a year of drought, and will not cease from producing fruit]” (Jeremiah 17:8). Ḥananya, Mishael, and Azarya, as it is stated: “Youths in whom there was no blemish, fair in appearance, [skillful in all wisdom, knowledgeable and understanding in thought, with ability to stand in the king's palace, and for him to teach them the writings and the language of the Chaldeans]” (Daniel 1:4). Daniel, as it is stated: “Since surpassing spirit, [knowledge, understanding, interpreting of dreams, declaring of riddles, and solving of problems were found in Daniel]” (Daniel 5:12). The messianic king, as it is stated: “The spirit of the Lord will rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom [and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord]” (Isaiah 11:2).

There is strength that is beneficial to its possessor and strength that is harmful to its possessor. Strength that is beneficial was possessed by David, for it is said: Behold, I have a son of Jesse the Bethlehemite, that is skillful in playing and a mighty man of valor (I Sam. 16:18). It is also written: Saul had slain his thousands and David his ten thousands (ibid. 18:7); and: All Israel and Judah loved David (ibid., v. 6). The strength of Goliath was harmful to its possessor, for he profaned and blasphemed against God. Goliath called: Choose a man for you (ibid. 17:8), but in the end, When the Philistines saw that their mighty man was dead, they fled (ibid., v. 51). He had been slain with a (single) stone hurled from a sling.

R. Tanchum said: "Bar Kappara lectured in Sepphoria: "What does the passage (Ruth, 3, 17) These six barleys gave he unto me mean? How are six barleys to be understood? Shall we take it literally. Ib. b) Would a man like Boaz give six grains of barley as a gift? Shall we assume that it means measures of barley. How can a woman carry six measures? Therefore the six barleys were a prediction that in the future six sons would come out of her, each of them would be blessed with six blessings: viz., David, Messiah, Daniel, Chananyah, Mishael, and Azaryah. David — as it is written (I Sam. 16, 18) Then answered one of the servants, and said, Behold, I have seen a son of Jesse the Betlechemite, who is skilled as a player and a mighty valiant man, and a man of war, and intenigent in speech and a person of good form, and the Lord is with him. And R. Juda said in the name of Rab: "The whole verse was said by Doeg the Edomite, with the intention of slander, i.e., who is skilled as a player — who knows how to ask questions; a mighty valiant man, who knows how to answer questions; a man of war — who understands argument in the disputations of the Torah; intelligent in speech — he understandeth how to derive one thing from another (argument by analogy); a person of good form — who is able to give good reasons for Halakhas; the Lord is with him — the Halakha always prevails with him. To all the things mentioned above Saul said: "My son Jonathan possesses all the same qualities." But when he heard that the Halakha prevailed with him, a qualification which he himself did not possess, he felt discouraged and began to be jealous, for concerning Saul it is written (I Sam 14, 47) And whithersoever he turned himself, he caused terror, and about David it is written: In whatsoever he turned to he was successful. But whence do we know that it was Doeg who said so? From the following passage (Ib. 16, 18) One of the servants — the most distinguished of them; and (Ib. 26, 8) And his name was Doeg the Edomite, the chief of the herdsman that belonged to Saul. Messiah — as it is written (Is. 11, 2) And there shall rest upon him the spirit of the Lord, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might; the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord. Daniel,Chananyah, Mischael and Azaryah — as it is written (Dan. 1, 4) Lads in whom there should be no kind of blemish, but who should be handsome in appearance, and intelligent in counsel and might; the spirit of knowledge and undersatnd science, and such as should have the ability to serve in the king's palace, and that these should be taught the learning and the language of the Chaldeans. And it is also written Vaharikho (animated). R. Alexandri said: "Infer from this that he is always overloaded with the divine commandments and chastisements resting upon him as Rechayim (a handmill)." Raba said: "He judges by smelling," as it is written further, And not after the sight of the eyes shall he judge, and not after the hearing of ears… . [nevertheless] he judges with righteousness the poor and decides with equity for the suffering ones of the earth, and he shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth, and with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked. [Hence, if not by the eye and not by the ear, it must be by smelling.] Therefore when [Bar Kokhba] said to the sages: "I am Messiah," they answered him concerning Messiah: "It is written He judges by smelling; let us see if he does also judge by smelling." As soon as they saw that he did not judge by smelling, they executed him. And now cocerning the verse cited about Chananyah, Mishael, etc., 'they had no blemish.' R. Chama b. Chanina said: "Not even a scratch, caused by the piercing of the lancet, was to be found on their bodies." The ability to serve in the king's palace, i.e., they were able to restrain themselves from laughing, sleeping and dreaming, and even from departing for one's necessity for fear of the king.

17 "And he took." As he took his heart. "It is not an enemy who curses me —I could bear that; it is not my foe who vaunts himself against me —I could hide from him" (Psalms 55:13). This is [referring to] Doeg and Achitofel who were cursing me. They were not my enemies, but they cursed me and did not call me by my name. Rather, "Why did the son of Yishai not come" (I Samuel 20:27); "I have seen the son of Yishai" (I Samuel 22:9); "Behold I have seen a son of Yishai" (I Samuel 16:18). This is, "It is not an enemy who reviles me —I could bear that." "But it is you, my equal, my companion" (Psalms 55:14). As he was a giant in Torah [knowledge]. "And my acquaintance" - as he would give and take in Jewish law (halakha). "Sweet was our fellowship; [we walked in God’s house with feeling]" (Psalms 55:15). What is [the understanding of] "we walked in God’s house with feeling?" As it is taught, "A bull was offered by twenty-four (priests)," so that the feelings could feel [it], as it is stated, "we walked in God’s house with feeling." "Let Him incite death against them" (Psalms 55:16). Rabbi Elazar said, "They had a counsel of heresy within them. To what were they similar. To a house full of straw, but there were holes in the house and the straw went into them. After some days, that straw that was in those holes began to come out [on the house's exterior. Then] everyone knew that the house was of straw. So [with] Doeg and Achitofel, they did not have [performance of] commandments at the beginning. Even though they [later] become masters of Torah, they were like their beginning." This is [the understanding of], "for where they dwell, there evil is." Another interpretation (of Psalms 55:13-16): It is speaking about Moshe. "It is not an enemy" but rather Korach, who is from mine, "who curses me". "Sweet was our fellowship," Aharon and Korach are the same; we walked in God’s house with feeling," this one slaughters and offers and that one sprinkles the blood. "Let Him incite death against them" - who brought death upon himself. "They went down alive into Sheol, with all that belonged to them, etc." (Numbers 16:33).